Archive for August, 2008

So I Suck, and Here are the Top Ten Reasons Why

(Because “Top Ten” of anything is supposed to be the magic bullet for exciting headlines.)

I haven’t been blogging.

My gym caught fire.

I called in sick Friday. I felt horrid. The worst part about calling in sick on Friday is that no one believes you’re not just hung over. But I wasn’t.

I still haven’t taken the new (used) car to the shop. It has a few minor things left to be fixed that drive me mad, but it’s completely drivable, so I’ve been putting it off.

Boys are kind of predictable right now. In college, all I wanted was a boyfriend. In the real world, all I want is someone who can hold my interest.

My job is okay. My boss wants me to have input into the hiring process and the business strategy. It’s scary.

I’m the youngest employee. I have to manage work done by people much older than me, and sometimes I have to say things they don’t want to hear.

I try to compensate by keeping gum at my desk. There’s a Post-It that says, “Free Gum :).”

See the smiley face? I’m a friendly guy. Please don’t get mad at me.

This wasn’t a real blog entry.

Hump Day Pick Me Up

It’s Wednesday! You’ve survived halfway through the week.

Reward yourself with Uh Huh Her’s first music video, “Not a Love Song.” (Secretly I wish to befriend all of the lipstick lesbians in the world. Starting with Leisha Hailey.)

There’s a unicorn!

What’s the Future of Suburbia? Gay Families.

Stephen J. Dubner over at the Freakonomics blog asked a bunch of “smart people,” What Is the Future of Suburbia?

One of those smart people is Gary Gates, PhD. He thinks the suburbs are going to become very, very gay.

Suburbs, home ownership, and marriage — what’s left but the kids? In 1990, fewer than one in ten same-sex couples had children. Today, it’s more like one in five. In states like Mississippi, South Dakota, Alaska, South Carolina, and Louisiana, it’s one in three. The gay-by boom is alive and well in small town and suburban America. And these new parents are largely non-white. African-American and Latino/a lesbians and gay men are two to three times more likely than their white counterparts to be raising kids.

So back to the question at hand — my vision of suburbia circa 2050. Lesbian and gay families will be a much more visible community fixture. They’ll probably be married, own their homes, be raising a few kids, and will very likely not be white.

Cool.

Don’t Let Interlopers Muddle Your Message

I was mean to someone tonight, but it all worked out and I made a new blogger friend instead.

He’s Jun Loayza from Living the Startup Life. I noticed him after one of his posts came up on the Brazen Careerist homepage.

Brazen Careerist - Edited title

When I clicked over to his blog to leave a comment, I was pretty shocked by his original title.

Living the Startup Life - Original title

The editor for the Brazen Careerist network (of which I am a member) decided that “In My Experience, Sex is Probably Overrated” was a stronger title than the original “Sex is Overrated.”

Really, Brazen Careerist editor? Really?

For one thing (and correct me if I’m wrong, gentle readers), “in my experience” is already implied. The Brazen Careerist is a network of personal bloggers. Just about any post on the network could theoretically be prefixed with “in my experience,” but that adds no meaning or value. It only adds extra wordiness to an otherwise eye-popping, attention-grabbing title.

But the bigger crime is the “Probably.” What a surefire way to sound like you lack confidence! In the edited title, it sounds like Jun is unsure of his central thesis when in fact he is opinionated and articulate.

However, this isn’t an attack on the Brazen Careerist editor(s). (Even though they never feature my witty, witty posts… grrr.) I’m sure they’ve got a lot of blog posts to deal with and didn’t give this title much thought at all.

This is a life lesson. Really.

The lesson is this: Other people do not care about you. Not as much as you do. At the end of the day, you’re the one who looks dull when your article/report/blog gets edited into mediocrity.

Is this particular an example a big deal? No… well, not to me. But that’s the point: Maybe it’s a big deal to Jun. What if this blog post had been his personal shining moment of glory?

I run into similar scenarios nearly everyday at work, where I help our clients develop websites. There are generally two types of client.

  1. The “you deal with it” client
  2. The take-charge control freak

Guess which one ends up with the awesome website?

It’s the control freaks, of course, but not necessarily because they have undiagnosed OCD. They’re the ones that care about how I’m crafting their online reputation. They’re the ones that argue with me about their sites.

It’s not that I purposefully don’t try as hard for the lackadaisical clients. I try to build everyone the best website possible—but the client’s business is not my business. I can’t possibly know their businesses like they do.

It’s the same with you and the middle-men with which you choose to associate. Every time you join an organization, get a new client, or start a new job, you’re handing over the keys to a little piece of your personal reputation.

Sometimes it’s not such a big deal. Sometimes it is. Either way, it’s your butt on the line when interlopers muddle your own personal brand.

Is Katy Perry Homophobic?

The blogosphere is flush with discussion of Katy Perry’s hit single, “I Kissed a Girl.”

Here’s the vid, in case you’ve been living under a rock, or I dunno, listening to actual grown-up music:

As soon as the song hit the airwaves, politically correct homos everywhere cried “Homophobia!”

The offending lyrics seem to suggest that girl-on-girl kissing is “not what good girls do.”

I kissed a girl just to try it
I hope my boyfriend don’t mind it
It felt so wrong
It felt so right
Don’t mean I’m in love tonight

It’s not what
Good girls do
Not how they should behave
My head gets
So confused
Hard to obey

Silly me, at first I thought the whole cheating-on-your-boyfriend bit was what Katy meant by “not how they should behave.” I didn’t think she was commenting on homosexuality itself.

But one of her other songs is called “Ur So Gay,” about her hated ex-boyfriend. The case against Ms. Perry doesn’t look very good.

I’ve seen different reactions from other gay bloggers.

The New Gay interviewed Ms. Perry about her songs “I Kissed a Girl” and “Ur So Gay.” Turns out she hasn’t kissed a girl. She just sings about it. She’s flirting with the idea of flirting with lesbianism:

The New Gay: Have you ever actually kissed a girl?

Katy Perry: I think I will, I’m holding out for Megan Fox.

The New Gay: So you haven’t actually kissed a girl. Then the whole song is a fantasy?

Katy Perry: Yeah, it’s fantasy, it’s a song about curiosity.

MSNBC then commented on the New Gay interview in article about Katy Perry’s homophobic hits:

The New Gay conducted a confrontational interview that had a rattled Perry actually say, “My closest friends happen to be gay.” She wasn’t being ironic. Celebrity blogger Mollygood pointed out Perry comes from a religious upbringing (she used to record Christian music as Katy Hudson) and in her New Gay interview, Perry talks about how in her “strict, suppressed household,” homosexuality was considered “wrong.” But as Mollygood also says, that’s not so far removed from the message she’s sending with her hit songs, whether she realizes it or not.

But others aren’t so quick to hate on Katy. Fannie of “Ask Fannie” and Below the Belt fame thinks maybe the fact that a song about girls kissing girls hit #1 in the U.S. signifies how we’ve come:

Now, I will be the first to be critical of Perry’s brazen capitalization of queer women’s identities and lives for her own personal gain, and without getting truly lumped with any of those pesky social disadvantages to actually being queer, like homophobia and discrimination. Perry carefully navigates the subtle line between queer transgression and pandering to heterosexual male voyeurism which I have always found oddly aroused by gratuitous displays of lesbianism. However, for all her vices, could Perry’s one-hit-lesbo-wonder be a benchmark in queer inclusion in popular culture?

I’m torn. I want to believe that Katy Perry was just ignorant, not purposefully homophobic. But she’s got the backing of a major music label… Surely their P.R. department sent her a memo… “Hey Katy, Your songs are full of hate. LYLAS! XOXO!”

What do you think? Katy Perry—neo-conservative undercover operative on mission to spread hate—or pretty white girl who doesn’t know any better and wants to make a lot of money?

Paris Hilton 4 Prez

Here’s your hump-day pick-me-up as I run out the door to go to work.